![]() |
Past Exhibition | ||
| Exhibitions: Past Exhibition - Kate Palmer | |||
| |
pushing the blood back into my fingersKate Palmer 12 March - 18 April 2009
View the online catalogue (5mb)
pushing the blood back into my fingers
The drawings here share the same size and paper, but the binary structure is transformed: here there is overlap, obscured or eroded though it may be at times; there the gap gives way to contact in the face of an energy as forceful as it is tenuous. Elsewhere the thin line finds a new density, a scarring that is a quickening, a congealing that hints at liquid depth. These developments coincided, if they were not prompted by, a trip to Switzerland, where she had lived for the first seven years of her life. My grandmother died last year, and on impulse I booked a
trip to Saas-Fee, in the Alps – a small, stunningly beautiful village
1,800m up on the edge of a glacier. I had wanted to learn snowboarding
and my partner had always wanted to ski. I hadn’t been at all sure
what it would mean to me, to be back in Switzerland, but on our way up
to the mountains we passed Lausanne, where we had lived, and I suddenly
felt the loss of those years. I was reeling with memories: the elaborate
flowerbeds on the edge of Lake Geneva, hiking in the mountains in the
summer, florentines and hot chocolate on special mornings. These things
and so many others flooded back to mind, wonderful and painful at the
same time. Talking about it now, Kate comes out with what seems a surprising parallel, recalling Ted Hughes’s short story “The Rain Horse.” A young man walking a very different landscape, bleak and raw, encounters a horse that pursues him, beautiful in its animality yet so dangerous to him that he must destroy it. Having done so, he is left numb, “staring at the ground as if some important part had been cut out of his brain.” But neat picture-postcards leave a lot out, too. I’ve become passionate about snowboarding, for the
landscape, for the speed, most of all, perhaps, for the fluidity of it
– moving my weight from one edge of the board to the other, slow-rolling
like mercury, tight and contained but quick and reactive. Sometimes the
rhythm of my carved arcs is interrupted by rocks, trees or people needing
a sudden response, a recalculation. As I follow the new line down, slung
cables pass overhead, sharp ski lines slash the snow, and the vivid blue
shadows of trees cut across the slopes. And here Kate comes up with another unexpected association, a scene in Hitchcock’s Spellbound where the supposed Dr Edwardes, played by Gregory Peck, is disturbed by lines drawn with a fork on a white tablecloth by Ingrid Bergman’s Dr Constance Petersen. Edwardes isn’t Edwardes, she finds out. He’s suffering from amnesia, he doesn’t know who he is, but thinks he may have murdered the doctor he was pretending to be. The search for a solution to the stranger’s mystery takes us, through the interpretation of his dream – a dream designed by Dalí – to the ski-resort where Edwardes met his death, and where he remembers who he is. John Ballantine now also remembers the scene when as a child, sliding downstairs, he had accidentally killed his brother. And it is this forgotten trauma that has led him to blame himself for Edwardes’ death. The sleuthing that sees Dr Petersen finally confront the true killer begins with a wrinkle in the white fabric; her curiosity is provoked by Ballantine’s reaction; but that liminal mark is itself a quickening in her own blankness, the awakening of desire. We talked too about Peggy Phelan’s discussion of Caravaggio’s The Incredulity of St Thomas, where Phelan suggests that in making possible the illusion of interiority and depth, perspective by the same token turns paintings into bodies. In both paintings and bodies, the play of surface and depth replays the relation of signifier and signified in language. For embodied subjectivity, enclosed in its own skin, the question of meaning becomes the question of love. Am I seen, am I heard, am I real for the other? For Caravaggio, says Phelan, Jesus is as doubtful as Thomas and needs to find his own proof in Thomas’s belief. There is no God outside the language of relation; at least, our most intimate, fundamental, unanswered and unanswerable questions can find responses only from human others, and from them no certainty. For us, depths are always surfaces. Writing about Kate’s earlier work, Jean Kalfa remarked: “How difficult it is not to represent a thing!” Shapes, textures and colours suggest shades and borders; in the presence of the latter, the mind rushes to objects, and these objects conjure up a world and a point of view. Working on and against these suggestions, she sought scrape and strip away the appearances of objecthood, to reveal an inchoate energy, a thrum of sensation. This was, one might say, depth without interiorities. The new paintings return to the same preoccupations, but as schooled and tempered by the last three years’ of drawing. In them, the “gap between” is relocated between the rigour of surface and the promise of depth. However, just as in the drawings a strict binary division has given way to greater complexity, the surface has lost its all-over, all-deconstructing omnipotence, allowing a new freedom within the same constraint. Surface does not cancel out the depth of our human objects, even though these may never bring with them the final assurance of their and our existence. On this tablecloth, there is room for the fork. It makes space for sleuthing, for the hope of finding that is desire. And we in our turn can acknowledge our track through the snow. Not in certainty but in doubt does Thomas’s finger find redemption. Copyright Dafydd Roberts and Kate Palmer 2009
|
|